LAST LOVE OF A CHOIRBOY
FIRST PART: CHILDHOOD
I.
I read the news in the Laramie, Wyoming Sunday newspaper:
Leslie Harmon was dead, following a short illness. She was twenty-nine years old.
This was the last act of a romantic epoch in my life; and the
first act of a mystery which, because never truly solved, continues to haunt me
in much the same way that earlier romantic epoch inspired me with awe.
First,
I should explain, that this romantic epoch of which I speak was not directly
experience by myself – that is, the love affair was between Leslie Harmon
and my best friend, Michael Clause.
I experienced the love vicariously, through the tales and emotional
extravagances of my friend – being his chief confidant throughout the
duration of the affair – yet, somehow, seeming to experience it with a
great intensity, an even greater intensity than I have ever experienced my own
rather intermittent romantic episodes.
It was a great love – the last great love I am fond of
calling it, perhaps through some need on my own part to establish a link with
greatness, with immortality, with a realm of experience larger than the trite
deeds of mere men, the latter group of which I sincerely admit to being a
member. This love was an act of
power, an act which shook the Earth, shook everything in the orbit of this
pair, shook the very foundation of my reality, shook my friend loose from my
watchful protection into a far-away land of mists and dreamy illusions.
This great love, and what appeared at the time to be its
culmination, was the end of my childhood in many ways. And, with the rupturing of my
childhood, a whole new sense of the world, a world more poverty-stricken, in my
view, succeeded the land of my own dreamy illusions.
This all probably makes little sense. I am not a writer by trade. I suppose I am a writer through
necessity instead. By trade I
suppose I am an Ôoffice managerÕ – whatever that means. I am married, with a young son named
Jake whom I named after the father of my friend, who, the father I mean, Jake
Clause, being in many ways my father, certainly being much more my father that my real father ever was.
I intend to say very little about myself. This is not my story. I introduce myself and my situation
only as a way of sketching my relation to the principals of this drama.
Michael Clause was born in Rawlins, Wyoming, December 17,
1950. Later, he would attach some
mystical important to his being born at the mid-point of the century. This all came much later, however
– and it probably should not even be mentioned at this time. We grew up together in Sinclair,
Wyoming, a small oil refinery town situated some six miles west of both of our
birthplaces, the Memorial Hospital in Rawlins.
At this point I should also introduce William Clause,
MichaelÕs older brother, born one year earlier, October 26, 1949. If I should allow myself another
digression this early in the tale, I would point out that Laura Clause, the
older sister of Michael and William, was born October 26, 1948. Michael Clause was expected (even
promised by Doctor Baker) to be born October 26, 1950. However, Michael resisted this precise
pattern, holding out two additional months in the dark warmth of his motherÕs
womb. Michael would later attach
mystical significance to his 11-month residence in the womb, connecting it to
the 11-year cycles of the SunÕs Ôbreathing patternsÕ, otherwise known as
sun-spots. But that is a different
story to tell, one that should come later I admit.
The formal names ÔWilliamÕ and ÔMichaelÕ came along somewhat
later in life, when a kind of formal distance was desired by each, formalizing
relationships, in the sense of driving a wedge between intimacy and friendship,
reflecting the later need each felt for isolation – solitude, if you will
– which became almost pathological in the end, when hermeticism of a sort
succeeded the political activism each expressed related to civil rights and the
Viet Nam War – when, as Michael was later fond of explaining, Time was
dethroned by Space, and the Dream-Reality was giving birth by the Day.
These
abstract conceptions, the later poetic language, hence, the later universe of
the two brothers, should not discolor the early image of these two. The Clause Brothers were, truly,
all-American boys: athletes, scholars, Catholic School boys, as adept at the
repetition of Latin phrases and spelling gymnastics as they were at the
secretive art of masturbation, as skilled in idealist fanaticism as they were
buoyed by the love of nature. I am
perhaps saying too much in too short a space. I donÕt intend to reconstruct their entire youth – I
should say ÔourÕ entire youth, for my own early life, if disconnected from
these two, and from their family, really resembles only the chaotic precision
of jigsaw puzzle pieces scattered on the old brown cardboard table at which we
all sat in the Clause Family yellow-brick house as the breath-heavy snows of
Wyoming winters pinched life from the collared air and sent us in to the sweet
hibernation to escape the icy winds and the inevitable suffocating darkness
– that is to say, my life, apart from the Clause Family, must remain an
incompleted image, rife with voids and devoid of colors, lacking sensation and
also lacking form.
(Please
excuse the awkward simile. An
Ôoffice managerÕ attempting to become a ÔwriterÕ surely, in excitement, might
tend toward artificial phrasing at times.
I apologize for this.)
It is
important that I mention the winter early in this narrative. Winter is more than a season in
southern Wyoming. Winter is a
stage manager, a form of diction, an all-powerful deity to which all other
beings paid humble obsequiousness.
Michael
Clause, later in life, would say that the Winter was his true mother; that
Winter, being the dominant mood, the dominant season of this landscape, created
from its bosom its own children – or sub-elements – spilling these
life-weary atomic factors out in to the other ÔseasonsÕ as Ôharvesters of the
golden appleÕ – a phrase totally alien to me, a concept unacceptable to
my view of necessity, yet, in hearing Michael say it, with his magnetic
certainty, an idea I could never quite shake, and which walks with me to this
day, in some ways like a heavy burden I carry, a burden, mainly, as an unsolved
clue, a riddle I might need to solve to really get closer to the source of
Michael ClauseÕs passionate madness.
Madness and language are always mixed, always materially connected.
I am a
detective more than a writer. This
is a mystery story – or so I am coming to believe.
There is a
great mystery interwoven in all this mystical transformation. I watched my best friend change from
comrade in ideals to passionate lover to battler of dragons, conqueror of fogs,
to an Icarus absolved; from a willful lover of humanity, in his ideals at
lease, to a woods-enchanted poet, speaking a language of beauty and horrible
distance. To a man (two men
really) at odds with the culture of materialism, indifferent to art and
culture.
I lost
Michael Clause somewhere in this process; and, in losing him, I lost the key to
some greatness. And it is the
utter loss of this world I feel most acutely. When a butterfly dies, all creation heaves a heavy sigh. It is the worldÕs loss. The butterfly must die, of course; yet
– and we all understand this – the world the butterfly leaves
behind, upon its death, is attendant to gravity and to the gradual
disappearance of the light. The
world can no longer fly.
When I read of Leslie HarmonÕs death, something inside me
also died. It was Michael Clause
in me which died. I felt it very
deeply. The death was
instantaneous. The room shook; the
lights quavered.
In many
ways, Leslie Harmon was my last link to my friend. As long as she lived, in the same town as myself, Laramie,
Wyoming, there was always a chance that Michael Clause might return. That was a great hope of my life. I felt inertia (fear would not do it)
might pull my friend back to Earth somehow. I felt that sorrow for lost youth might supercede his
journey, might force him to turn back, to the only woman who could absorb his
pride, and make him real, make him less that the god he so desired to become.
Yes,
Michael Clause was a proud young man.
Proud out of fear, I am sure – for all pride, in its inverse, is
fear. Fear of being discovered,
perhaps. Fear of being forced to
admit that godhood was an illusion, something the mind hatched as a trick on
the body, constructed by little manias that built formal psychic strictures in
childhood, when spirit and demonic practice played so freely with the
vulnerable being.
My hope
was that Michael Clause would appear at my door one day – I often
imagined it – telling me that he needed to rest, that he needed to live
near Leslie Harmon, in the same town, breathe the same air as his love did, even
if their destinies were malformed.
In my dream, I would be there to comfort my friend. I would be the one to offer him
shelter.
I should tell you that Leslie Harmon was married when she
met my friend. She had been
married two weeks when they met. Her husband, Donald, was in graduate school, studying
engineering at the University of Oregon.
Leslie
went to work at the University Library that late summer, at which Michael
Clause had been working for several years since his graduation. Michael worked the night shift. He wrote during the day. Yes, he was a writer – have I not
mentioned that yet? Later in this
story I will present to you some examples of his writing. He was even larger, as a person, than
his writing – yet his writing does hold clues to the savage altitudes to
which he could and did climb, brining musical notions back to Earth for those
of us unable to fly, unable to see broader landscapes of speculation (I hate to
use the word ÔtruthÕ in this context, everything being subject to relativism
this day and age).
It was
love at first sight – which might seem obsolete or out-of-date as a
description in this modern age (they met in 1976) – but that is an
essential clue to understanding this mystery. Each – Leslie Harmon and Michael Clause – each was
out-of-date. Neither really
existed in America in the 1970Õs.
It was as thought their love were written on a cloud. Not that it was without its physical
side – how could it be! Yet
there was something grand and heroic about their love, something sweeping in
its scope, a battle for the Queen of Heaven, a battle which Michael Clause
eventually lost – which swept him in to the underworld for ever.
The structure of this narrative may be disjointed – I
wish to warn you early of this. I
am no clever story-teller, but a novice seeking to share my memories with
strangers. Please allow me my
indiscretions, my asides, my occasional exaggerations – for they are the
stuff of my remembrances. To
cleanse this history by taking meat from the bone would cleanse it at the cost
of its flavor. Afterall, sterility
is no guide to creation. And
color, certainly, is not the shape of deception.
I loved Michael and William Clause more than any people I
ever met. They were my
brothers. I lived with them as brothers
from birth to our mid-twenties.
When LifeÕs rude rotations suddenly tore me away from them, it seemed to
me that, at that point, the world became flat. I moved in a lost agony of movement. I wan not clean any longer. I was not whole. I was not certain about my views, not
as filled with the vigor of decision as I once had been.
I married
not long after this happened, not really out of love, certainly not out of
passionate love – rather, out of a desperate desire to be finished, a
desire to be preserved in an easily-recognizable pattern, a pattern leading to
the grave with that marvelous monotonal alacrity that one might see when
watching a slaving beaver build its dam.
Shut down the vision to the most local ambitions – to be like
everyone else – and tune out the music that challenges unthinking
ambition.
I wanted
to hide from life when they left, for I had lost my twin towers, my twin
protectors. And I had also lost
young Michael, for whom I had acted as a protector for many years. Who would protect him now? Who would keep him from a tragic
flowering?
I say I
wished to hide from life when these brothers left town. I wished to bury my head in the bosom
of a woman – one need not be a follower of Freud to understand that this
woman replaced my own mother – never again to hear the cries of night
which tried to freeze me, which tried to trap me in a dark aloneness. And frozen I became, of course. Frozen in place. We become what we most fear – and
we fear what we most desire.
I came to
move in a cautious arid circle about the sun. Never daring to be the Sun, itself, wishing only to be ruled
by the mathematics of a mundane existence, surely measured.
Sometimes I am very hard on myself – judging myself
quite harshly for my lack of imagination, or my lack of courage to step out of
line. I tend to measure myself
against the two brothers. They
somehow seemed like gladiators – their later ÔdoctrineÕ of asceticism, of
living close to Death at all times, certainly is an example of this, worthy of
their favorite Roman, Marcus Aurelius.
Their
angry damning of America, their self-imposed exile, was another example of
their exacting code, fueled and framed by their Catholicism, no doubt, a
fanaticism which sought to war wit the gods, damning a world which seemed to
sanctify mediocre values. This was
their greatest pain – for, in these Christs, were also Satans. Michael once told me that he had met
Hitler, face-to-face (in a subtle sense, of course – in the world of the
dead, the world of the shadows) – and he had been instructed by HitlerÕs
ghost to annihilate the world.
ÔEven the
Destroyer must be defeated,Õ Michael concluded.
I did not
understand this then – still, IÕm not certain that I do. I do not doubt what he said
however. I cannot doubt his experience. He lived in a land from which I am
forbidden, where the laws are different, and the realities less fixed.
Michael
once said: ÔBe thankful that you are forbidden from entering here. Keep your own mind. In this land there are only mountains
with no limitsÉÕ
The second
sentence, ÔKeep your own mind,Õ as Michael pointed out to me, was lifted from
AeschylusÕs Prometheus Bound, a work from which he often quoted, the last time I saw
him. Michael had come to view
himself as Prometheus. Zeus
commands Prometheus to annihilate mankind, in order that a new crop might be
planted by the gods. Prometheus
refuses to be the Destroyer; so, he is cast out of heaven, chained to the Mount
of Caucasus (the ÔWhite ManÕs BurdenÕ he called it), an exile from the joyful,
for he had rebelled against the will of the Titans.
More will
be said about this story as my own narrative develops. Michael Clause told me that in the
structure of this myth, the secret of evolution of the Earth could be seen.
Michael Clause planted a great mystery in my mind.
He spoke
of himself being the ÔfatherÕ of children – Ômind-born childrenÕ he
called them – saying: ÒIt is the calling of other human beings to
procreate the species. I have been
called, instead, to give life to their mindsÉÕ
I am
already telling your more about his later life than about his childhood. That is not my intention here. I wish to structure this sequence, at
least superficially, in relation to Time.
I find this rather difficult to do, however, since all Time, that is,
all his life, seems interwove, like an exotic Persian rug, scenes lace to other
scenes, attitudes merging out of previous statements or themes. The pure structure of Reason, with a
Time-form of Future-Present-Pas, the straight line within the circle -- Michael Clause would say: ÔThe
diameter is the
rule of Time. It is an erection;
something man-made. When Time
stops, the erection is gone.Õ – does not really seem to describe the
world in which Michael Clause lived, and into which his spirit, even now, seems
to be pulling me.
Michael
said: ÔThere are Two Times. One,
the everyday Time, Waking Reality, which we call Time. The other, eternal Time, Time without
differentiation – the Fourth-Dimensional Time – which we call space,
with its analogue, the World of Dreams, which is akin to NonBeingÉÕ
I must come back to Earth. This is the later Michael speaking. Speaking through me, it seems –
which frightens me no little bit.
Sometimes, when sitting at this table, pecking at the keys of my Royal
typewriter,, seeking to conjure up memories of my friend (actually, my friends, both Michael and William), I
actually feel his presence in my room.
I donÕt know what it is. I
mention it to no one; yet something is here with me, some force which seems to
help organize me memories.
I will
digress as I attempt to tell this story, as I must make mention, occasionally,
of world events which fill my other side of experience. It is the Winter, actually the Autumn
of 1982. October 30, a Saturday. The Cold War between Ronald Reagan and
the frightened bears in Moscow heats up in a display of words. America has sunk into a deep sleep, a
state of sleepwalking, in which any atrocity might occur. It is akin to Germany, before the rise
of Hitler both brothers have assured me.
I do not wish to believe that.
There is a gnawing in me, however, which makes me fear their such dire
predictions.
Bottles of
Tylenol (aspirin) have been poisoned by a madman; and the insanity has received
full play on our Midnight Journal news media stations. America now has a new fad. Mass poisoning of consumer items. I read where a football crowd, on being
warned that the Pepsi they were drinking was poisoned, began to fall like
fractured leaves. In all, fifty-nine
fans were stricken. Later, we are
told, that Pepsi has been acquitted – and these fans were found guilty,
instead, of being subjects of Ômass paranoiaÕ.
I mention
this since it is in line with the predictions of the Clause Brothers of their
description of the ÔNight RealityÕ we had entered. More prophecies will appear as I proceed. The later Clause Brothers and their
prophecies were the same thing; they had become their ideas, leaving a great
cavern, a chasm I should say, between those living at a different time and a
different status than themselvesÉ
But I must get back to Leslie Harmon, for it is only in her
that gentle reality, or Hope, seems to abide. Leslie Harmon was born May 9, 1954, in Battle Creek,
Michigan. Her family moved several
times; she grew up, mainly, in Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, a bedroom suburb
of New York, elite, excruciatingly civilized – millions of miles in
social status and density of self-perception, from the tiny refinery town in
which we all grew up, even if only distanced several thousand miles on the
map. This is an important piece of
evidence to digest, in fact. The
distance between Leslie Harmon and Michael Clause was immense. Leslie Harmon, maiden name Rhoades, a
descendant of the Queen of England, or so her family tree purported, a
connected which she tried to diminish even while making sure to mention
it. Leslie had been born in the
clouds. She was petite, with long
brown hair, hair falling below her waist, a delicate figure, an angel she
seemed to Michael Clause, who had fallen into his world from some great height
to stand before him. This great
distance, of class, of breeding, of background, fueled their romance.
It is the
foreign, the unknown, our opposites, we desire most.
Michael
Clause, to Leslie Harmon, was as dark and mysterious as, to Michael, Leslie was
bright. Leslie was Venus, the
morning star.
Michael
was a Ônight personÕ. His way of
life ran counter to the norm. He
was a writer, but a writer of dark, psychological studies. He was a mystic. He believed in mystery, needed mystery,
labored in the dream light.
Each
was a great mystery to the other, as deep as the ocean, and as dangerous,
filled with storms.
II.
Michael Clause, although he liked to speak of himself as
another Lord Byron, actually was closer to Keats in my judgment. Michael Clause was virginal when he met
Leslie Harmon. Not a virgin, but
virginal. (IÕll explain this
later.) He was a Catholic Boy, an
Ex-Catholic Boy, who had rejected the Church because of its falseness. He did not reject Catholicism, in its
letter, so much as a Church which had soiled and betrayed the word of
Jesus. He demanded perfection from
his world. He could only love the
personification of Perfection.
Grace. Grace was perfection – so he had once
claimed. Leslie Harmon was Grace
personified to him. Her walk was
light; she was erect, yet her step was light, fairy-like, filled with Joy.
Yes,
she was a goddess of Joy, a goddess who raised him out of his underground life
to show him the prospect of Love and its Virtue.
I
have never known anyone as happy, as joyous, as Michael Clause, as this love
began to blossom; nor anyone so desperate with pain when the love eventually
fractured.
Michael Clause was the youngest child of Jacob Clause and
Mary Ellen Clause, who had met, after World War II, while both were working at
the Sinclair Oil Refinery. Mary
Ellen was working to save enough money to travel to Australia, a journey she
would never make, but which her son, William, would make, in 1974, as an
English teacher, assigned to Perth, where he experience the ÔDown-UnderÕ with
little sense of amazement.
Jake
Clause had worked at the refinery prior to the war, being originally hired on
the basis of his athletic skills; each town in the 1930Õs fielded a softball
team vied, eventually, for national honors – hence, good athletes were
given priority for jobs; a good team for Sinclair (the town) was good
advertising for Sinclair (the oil company). After spending three years in Europe during World War II, fighting
in George PattonÕs army, which experience Jake rarely mentioned, until later,
when the boys showed real interest in his exploits, Jake Clause returned to his
job, having gained seniority in the company on the basis of his work and
military service.
As
an aside, I might mention that Jake Clause had, as trophies of his European
experience, a German military helmet, and photographs of death camps he helped
to liberate in 1945, including boxcars filled with naked corpses and nearly-starved
Jewish men and women. The Clause
Brothers clung to these mementos as indicators that Evil, as a force of nature,
did exist in the
world – and a very real pride that their father, Jake Clause, had fought
on GodÕs side against the DevilÕs side and had defeated the Devil and saved
life on earth, preventing a slide into slavery, murder and darkness.
For
several years after the war, Jake worked, played softball (the Sinclair team
twice making the National Tournament in Chicago, once winning the championship),
drank with his friends, live (or so it is described, although I have my doubts
about it) a care-free life, without much thought for the future or of plans to
become a husband and a father.
There
is an age a man reaches when the
voices begin to suggest: It is time for you to be married. Is it the voice of the gods, seeking to
direct a man away fromÉwhat? A
meaningless life? Competition with
the gods themselves? What is it
truly? Voices from the grave? Voices of my ancestorsÉ?
I
heard those voices also, not only from my family and friends – voices
within, insistent voices, angry voices, voices demanding I submit to my
fate. I gave in rather easily to
the voices. Why resist such
threatened terror?
Jake
Clause also heard those voices. Every man hears them – as does every woman. Jake heard the voices – yet he
resisted them. For a man to marry
– yes, I know it as a fact – he must be willing to castrate
himself. Yes, castration, in the
name of Law and Order. He must
give his power to the woman; he must accept his own demise. He does not lose his power totally,
however. He rules his children; he
even rules his wife at times. Yet
he does not oppose the Powers That Be, by expressing his continued ÔfreedomÕ
from social strictures. The unmarried
man is a threat to order. He is,
in effect, saying: I will challenge your authority! I will not submit to your rules and your conventionsÉ!
The
act of self-castration was not an easy thing for Jacob Clause to do – nor
was it easy for his two sons, or even for their elder sister, who still has not
married, though she is living with her partner (divorced), and her daughter and
son. Jacob Clause (he never called himself ÔJacobÕ – it
was always ÔJakeÕ, for ever seeking the proximity of the informal appellation,
although he, too, lived at a distance from all) – Jacob Clause was a
mystery to his friends: a gentle, sensitive man, yet a man whom other men did
not cross. He was powerful in his
being – powerful enough to be sensitive. He existed between both worlds: neither a brute, nor a
weakling; neither of ÔmanagementÕ (although a Ôwhite collarÕ worker, an
administrator in the Payroll Department at the refinery), nor of ÔlaborÕ,
having friends in both divisions, yet belonging heart-and-soul to neither.
His
sons followed this directive, although, often, it was not easy. Both young men were passionate. The Viet Nam War (and the social
upheaval of the 1960Õs) turned them against their fatherÕs house, their
fatherÕs government, the so-called ÔestablishmentÕ: they marched in the
streets, condemning the American government and itÕs policies; ultimately, the
rejected ÔsuccessÕ in a blemished social system, which they considered fascist
and totalitarian, seeing the world polarized as black and white. Either a system is perfect or it is
evil. Of course, time would show
us that life was rarely this simple or categorical.
It
is dangerous for a nation to preach idealism, for, when Memory is born, and
crimes of the past uncovered (no nation is without historical crimes0, a nation
of Idealists condemn themselves to Hades.
So it was wit the two brothers.
The condemned America to hell, for the sins of the Fathers had been visited
upon them.
That was later, of course.
Michael
and William were ambiguous by nature – that is, not fixed,
mysterious. Their early lives show
this pattern. Although they lived
in Sinclair, they went to school in Rawlins (St. JosephÕs Catholic School)
– hence, they did not totally belong to Sinclair (and their friends in
Sinclair), nor cold they totally belong to the world of their schooling.
They
rode a bus every day (we rode a bus every day), in which they were carried back
and forth between the two worlds: Sinclair being the heaven pole, peaceful,
settled, beautiful; Rawlins, the hell pole: dry, noisy, violent, filled with
racial tension (Mexicans and Anglos).
This movement between two worlds became a defining pattern of their
lives.
Mercury
became the symbol of this (especially with Michael, especially when he
discovered that Michael the Archangel was connected in Catholic theology with
the planet Mercury, the ÔMessengerÕ): he who carried messages from Gods to Men,
yet belonged to neither world, for each was incomplete, demanding some form of
allegiance to their incompleteness.
The world, to be complete, needed to have both sides melded. This, indeed, became the logic of the
metaphor of marriage, which Michael came to understand during his time spent
with Leslie Harmon.
Man
was the Day World. Woman was the
Night World. For wholeness to
occur, marriage of the two worlds was required. The opposite of Wholeness was alienation, which was a form
of mental illness.
Man
was Life, with all its requisite competition, struggle and domination. Woman was Death, rest, peace,
comfort. Life and Death were two
parts of the same whole.
Struggling against Death was allowed as a part of the Life force –
but anything would also have to submit, at some point, to the force of Night,
to peace, to comfort, sleep, in order to become whole.
This,
of course, was a later understanding.
A man has to forgive his father, in order to be able to forgive
himself. Forgiving imperfection. Forgiving friends, and family, and even
adversaries. Without this, there
was no entry into GodÕs kingdom.
Neither Michael nor William were good followers. William once used the line of Groucho
Marx in describing this propensity: ÔI could never respect any club that would
stoop so low as to have me as a member.Õ
William
grew more humorous in his later years.
He laughed at reality: he saw fate as mere folly.
Each
of the Clause Brothers saw himself as a leader, yet wished not to have a
following. Each craved solitude
– hence, cultivated anonymity – although Michael more so than
William. William had a more social
nature, was more popular, had had girl friends throughout school, had always
had a group of friends. Michael
had always been much more isolate.
Yet
a dark, magnetic power is grown in solitude; and power tend to attract new
alliances. The art of having friends
and not being possessed by those friends is a delicate creation and
proposition. To rule the Earth or
to rule the Heavens? To be a Man
or to be a God? That, really, was
the questionÉ.
The philosophical issue of Power haunted Michael during his
last days on the earth (I use this phrase with purpose) – for, as Michael
told me: ÔTo seek power, to achieve power, is to be cursed with power.Õ
I
should add here that by ÔpowerÕ Michael was clearly referring to the ÔpowerÕ
espoused by Carlos Casteneda in his books in the 1970Õs, indicating power in
the unseen world, the non-physical worlds. William Clause fell under the spell of Casteneda for a
time. But to Michael Clause,
Casteneda reeked of death, darkness, the nagual – Michael, instead, fell
under the spell of Alice Bailey and, later, Helena Blavatsky, and the
theosophical movement generally, which stressed that Theology, Philosophy, and
Science were, originally, part of the same system, unified – and only
later became differentiated, opposed, disciplines, when Western Science split
the atom apart.
Michael
argued with me that the task of Western thinkers would now be to reassemble the
broken pieces back in to a whole picture again. He felt that this was his duty as a writer, to re-present
the entire picture.
My narrative becomes heavy with philosophical disputations,
which are not demons to the majority of us, and certainly not to myself. I am a man; I have no pretensions to
being a god; nor could I have; it has never been an issue to me.
There
is no way for me to tell this story without delving in to the nature of these
philosophies. Michael Clause, in
the end, had ceased to be Michael Clause.
He had become a shadow being; he had become Ônon-personalÕ. In the end, he believed himself to be a
dangerous man. He spoke of his own
darkness, his own forsaken nature – although speaking, at the same time,
with light emanating from his being, and an ever-buoyant spirit. He had become both worlds, light and
darkness, hope and despair, peace and war, fused in to one.
As I was saying, Michael was virginal when he met
Leslie. His inclination had been
to wait for Perfection to arrive.
He had been pursued by other women, whom he rejected out of hand, though
not with scorn, more out of embarrassment, even fear of hurting them. He was the Hunter; he would not have it
otherwise. There must have been an
innate sense in him of which ÔgameÕ, which prey, was inaccessible. Only those women who were absolutely
inaccessible did he pursue. There
were many reasons for this. Fear
of success was surely one; and fear of being possessed by the object of his
triumph. ÔEach dream or goal must be inaccessible!Õ he once told
me. ÔImmortality is the pursuit of
the inaccessible!Õ
Immortal
love, then, by definition, must be the pursuit of the woman who could not be
caught, only glimpsed, only fathomed.
Leslie
Harmon was truly inaccessible to Michael Clause. Class separated them.
Class philosophies separated them.
Marriage separated them.
The custom against adulteryÉyes, this it was that possibly brought them
together. It was the breaking of
law which surely must have appealed to both of them. Leslie screamed to shatter the bonds of matrimonial
convention, of a marriage without true love; Michael struck with his sword
against the corrupt, fossilized, artificial institutions in order to save his
princessÉ
Michael
must have known, deep within himself – he was very good at seeing
phenomena right to the root – that this love was doomed to tragedy. Another reason Michael did not accept
the advances of other women was a kind of noble understand that, in unrequited
love, one loves and the other is loved.
The one who loves is doomed to break; the other may pass from passionate
flattery and compassion to sorrow, yet ultimately demands freedom. Guilt may follow this; but never the
death of Love as an Idea, of Love as an Absolute, of Love as a god. Michael must have understood this at some
level: in his love with Leslie, he, Michael, would need to be the one most
deeply wounded; to wound was not so noble a role.
Some
people curry tragedy, finding in the rending of the Soul a more noble life, a
more grand and glorious fate. So
it was with Michael Clause. He
demanded tragedy. To be a man was
not enough; to be a fallen god was virtue.
III.
I have intentions of breaking this narrative into four
segments: Childhood; The Notebook (a journal and assorted papers kept by Michael
during and about his love affair with Leslie Harmon); Letters (letters written by Michael to
myself, after he chose exile, left Laramie, Wyoming and went to live with his
brother in Eugene, Oregon); finally, The Last Act (clues and reminiscences from those
who knew the Brothers Clause in Laramie and then in their last days in Eugene).
This
is a fine outline or structure for me to work with. It wonÕt be pure in its construction I am sure. I am too prone to reverie, too
undisciplined in my thinking, to rigidly build a system, and then to live in it
alone. I warn you about this
structure as a way of defining it to myself. Now that I have warned the reader I can move forward to
something else.
William and Michael Clause were the closest of brothers, the
closest I ever knew. Not that
there was no conflict between them.
There was conflict, competition, desire to be accepted, and seen as
triumphant. William was the older,
the protector – even his name, William, from ÔWill-HelmetÕ, Ôdefender of
the WillÕ, seemed to define his role on Earth in relation to his brother.
Michael
had an iron will, was absolutely self-disciplined; in less complimentary terms,
he was a bit of a fanatic, who struggled with precision, with virtue and with
rage to raise an image or an edifice of perfection. I have mentioned this before, yet it bears magnifying. And it was only much later than Michael
came to realize that to strive for perfection was to create its shadow or
opposite, which he called Evil.
The struggle for power, or the will to self-perfection, had a
mirror-effect: the creation of a kind of fascism. He saw this eerie fate strung like beads before his
eyes. To be Jesus at one point in
time was also to create Hitler at another point in time. The Jew who was not a Jew; neither Jew
nor Gentile; existing in and beyond both worldsÉ
Michael
came to fear anti-semitism in himself and in his nation. He became haunted by his visions. He saw too much. The Future had consumed him.
I am telling you now too much about MichaelÕs demise, and
not enough about his youth.
Sinclair,
Wyoming was an oddity in itself.
It was an old fashioned ÒCompany TownÕ – meaning all the residents
worked for the same ends, work for the same company. Cynics would point out to him that the same ends everyone
worked for was Harry Sinclair and the Board of Directors in New York City. There is some truth in that. But it isnÕt the whole picture. When the town was founded, the refinery
was built by an army of men living in tents in the city limits. Once the refinery was operational, all
the men who had built the refinery had work. They then built, one-by-one, the houses in the town. As a house was built, a tent or a wagon
was taken down in the park and a family moved in to the house. This went on for several years, until
all the men working at the refinery had a house for themselves and their family.
Michael
was never aware (nor were William or I, until years later) of the class
distinctions and political complications hidden beneath the surface of our fine
little Eden. We were children,
living in a peaceful, ordered, self-sufficient universe. If there were troubles wit the
plumbing, our mothers would call the refinery and plumbers would be sent from
the plant to fix pipes. Painters
from the refinery kept all the houses in town refurnished. Windows were replaced by refinery
artisans; electricians resurrected dead lighting and broken fuses; carpenters
appeared when the stairs were rotting.
It
all sounds rather idyllic, this scene from the Middle Ages, with these guilds
and hierarchies of order. And this
idyllic town was our childhood microcosm, our picture of how the world worked
and how the world should work.
Little wonder that the Clause Brothers would lean, in later years, when
molding a socio-political vision, toward the age of faith in which each city
was a country, each country was a culture; and nature, the world beyond, was
inhabited by gods and powers whose primary intent was to profit children.
Some
might say that the problem of the Clause Brothers was that they refused to grow
up; that they never faced reality.
In clinging to this ideal of life, the City-State, a miraculous island
of light, governed by a beneficent deity, the brothers walked a thin line
between a communist and a Christian utopia, with elements borrowed from both
sides of the political spectrum.
The Clause Brothers became ascetics in an attempt not to descend into
adulthood, into the crass pursuit of goods, consumerism being a modern religion
without the reference point of God or decent living, just one individual atom
armed against the next, competing eternally for the right to purchase the next
technological device wrested from the earth.
A
whole generation became anti-modern.
The theology (the psychological imperative) of apocalypse came in like
storm clouds sweeping over a nation.
And the nation, one strong, thriving, youthful and exuberant, was
brought to its knees as the darkness fell.
Yes,
the two brothers rebelled against Time, rebelled against their own aging
process, and sought to transform Reality into a Never-Ending Childhood. There is no denying this. And I did the same. And our whole nation does it now.
The
economic depression we are experiencing -- which threatens to decay into an
international anarchy, followed by the inevitable sinking into nationalistic
antagonism – this depression is a reflection of that psychic need to rest
and to escape Time.
As I have written, Michael spoke at length to me about our
nation entering the Night Cycle in our cultural manifestation; about how, when
religion, symbolism, and interest in the dream language, replaces the language
of mathematics and science, the language of the straight line (he said that the
diameter was an emblem of the man, and the straight line was a symbol of the
manÕs erect penis, which was a magic wand of sorts for a time, but then, after
having completed its act of creation, it became dead again, and was, in his
words, Ôabsorbed by the circleÕ, Space, or the WomanÕs Womb) the culture, and
its elements, escapes back into a dreamscape body -- the hierarchical order of
a society breaks and all elements return to a soup or undifferentiated whole,
represented by the circle. Chaos
if you will. The culture sleeps
(sleep-walks, perhaps is more accurate), turning away from the tyranny of Time
and Causality, escaping in to the phantasmagoria of nonbeing and Space. Each element became a body is space;
Life, in its structure, became atomic; only in re-awakening did a culture,
again, become molecularÉ.
Michael
Clause never really felt like he fit in Sinclair. All his early life he felt as though he was biding time
before leaving. As thought the
point he occupied was nothing more than a stopping point toward infinity. One of the last songs written by John
Lennon (before the principle of Peace was murdered by the principle of Chaos)
had the line: ÔIÕm just sitting here watching the wheel go round and
round. I really love to watch it
rollÉ. IÕm just sitting here doing timeÉÕ
Both
Michael and William came to feel the same, that they were sitting doing
time. ÔWaiting for Godot!Õ they
would laugh. Waiting; the power of
patience. ÔAll of life is
waiting,Õ William would say with a laugh.
ÔWaiting for what?Õ I would ask.
ÔWaiting for Death,Õ he would respond, although with a laugh, a kind
laugh, not morbid – almost defiant.
Defying life, it seemed to me.
Yet what could I tell of this other world they had seen?
They
rejected marriage and fatherhood and career as having no matter (a pun of a
sort, unintended). They waited
like John Lennon waited. Waiting
for God to relieve them from LifeÕs sorrow and emptiness.
When MichaelÕs love for Leslie Harmon disintegrated, a great
issue stood naked before him. Love
as an Absolute – had this been abolished by his experience? If Love was an Absolute, and his Love
had broken, then was Love not proven an illusion afterall. Another false promise? Another form on empty self-delusion?
Two
figures, two symbols, stood before Michael: Don Juan and Tristan. For the one, love was very occasional
and non-sacred; for the other, much as it was for Dante, Love happened once in
a lifetime. Love was a holy
sacrament.
Love
had been awakened in Michael, an all-consuming love, which ate the world in
fiery bites and tore the sap from aching leaves and cold moons. Desire rose within him, having slept for
so long in his darkened sanctuary.
Desire was hard and insistent and incapable of retreat.
If
his love for Leslie Harmon had been true, then she would have left her husband
to be with him; and, if not true, as true as it seemed and felt – nothing
had seemed or felt truer to Michael Clause in his life – then was Love,
itself, the Ideal, a mere illusion, one which Michael Clause could never again
worship because of its failure. In
other words, was Love a false god?
I
speak mainly of MichaelÕs feelings, since we talked quite often about them, and
since I have the notebook in which he expressed his feelings quite succinctly
and explicitly, keeping word for word records of their conversations and his
troubled longings.
I
will also speak of LeslieÕs feelings, mainly through the voice of Anita
Springs, Leslie HarmonÕs confidante during and after the romantic
cataclysm. Anita Springs was with
Leslie Harmon that Saturday when she died. The mysterious circumstances accompanying the death will
also be reported.
I have never felt America so depressed as I felt here
today. I went out last night to
visit a friend, rectnly separated from his wife. He was playing cards with other ÔbachelorÕ friends, drinking
beer and eating fried won-ton. I
stayed only a few minutes. The
depression was so thick; the hopelessness seemed like a lion in the tombs,
scaling the scene with desperation to flee. People have gone very deep in to themselves, to try to
escape the death which now stalks the streets and fields.
Yes,
dragons live deep in the self. If
you go in you must be prepared to fight; and you must fight with the strength
of thousands; and, if you win, you merely hold your own, praying for, waiting
for, Day, which will scatter Anxiety, and will prepare you for conflict. War. Even nuclear war?
Yes, perhaps. Perhaps even
the unthinkable. Suicide it is
– a form of suicide. For it
is annihilation we desire, annihilation of our own sorrow, our own loneliness,
our own atomic existence which gives us so little back.
At
least I have this story I am writing.
It lifts me away from my fears, from the EarthÕs darkness, into the
evanescence of my imagination. All
things are glorious in the wealth of the air. I walk amid legions here; and I see two lovers in the
stars. Vega and Altair
perhaps. The Weaver Fairy and the
Buffalo Boy, kept apart by the gods, allowed to meet on the earth for a short
time only each yearÉ
Snow
is beginning to fall again. I sit
in my attic study, removed from my wife and son, who, apparently, are below in
the den. I hear the
television. I assume they surround
it.
Winter
has such a grand beauty here. Snow
seems to cleanse everything, covering the aching Earth with its coat.
I
donÕt mean to be prosaic.
I
had a dream last night, after my experience with the bachelors, coming home
dejected, my house feeling empty and cold: and I feeling quite alone. A giant, a man about eight feet tall,
with huge muscles, dressed in a dark t-shirt, appeared in my office (I work as
the manager of the University Student Union). He was immense, powerful, wrathful, unjudging in his
fury. I feared his presence, tried
to usher him out before the others in the office saw him. He left; I watched him from my window;
he stood outside the building, placing something near the door.
ÔMy
God!Õ I cried. ÔHe has a
bomb! We need to get out of
hereÉ!Õ
He
appeared again in the office; he shattered everything. The entire office was demolished. I tried to get away. I fled down a staircase to the left, on
the opposite side of the room from where this monster stood. Half-way down the stairs, I met him
coming up. He took me in his arms:
I could not get away from him: his power was absolute.
I
eventually escaped somehow – I donÕt remember how – and ran to find
my home. It was not my home here
in Laramie, however, nor even my childhood home in Sinclair. It was my real home, somewhere far away, yet
safe. I ran toward the top of the
hill – yet, in looking back, I saw the monster watching me.
I
woke up terrified by this vision.
My wife tried to comfort me; I was haunted by the image.
The monster was myself. The
monster wished to annihilate my circumstances. Yet I also feared that the monster had a concrete, literal
reality. The man with the bomb. I thought of Ronald Reagan.
Each president we elect is a manifest symbol of our cultural
life-stage. This was an idea which
both William and Michael told me years ago; I did not understand what they
meant by this. It was too abstract
for me – too absolute – in its obscurity. I saw it last night, as I awoke from my tormented image.
I
am the monster with the bomb.
I
am Ronald Reagan.
I
am an actor in a B-grade movie who desperately desires to carry the world back
to childhood.
What has happened to us now? Where are we going?
Where have we been?
I
should not burden you with this vision.
I am usually optimistic. I
am a hard worker. I like to work. I need to work. Yet, when this titanic energy for
creation has no outlet, and turn in on itself – the Monster seeks to
destroy his creatorÉ
And
I had promised not to speak much of myself.
IV.
One of the earliest memories I have of Michael Clause (a
second-hand memory), a story often told by Mary Ellen Clause, MichaelÕs mother,
especially when a glass of evening wine or beer had loosened her tongue and
primed her emotions, releasing a flood of memories associated with her own
Golden Age, centered around MichaelÕs will-nature making itself known in the
first years of his life: when dinner was late, or when he was not paid enough
attention by his mother or father, Michael would hold his breath until he
passed out – not that this is all that unique, being an experience of
many parents; yet the duration of this behavior, lasting off-and-on for several
years, was somewhat peculiar. Even
more alarming to his parents was MichaelÕs supplemental self-assertion:
sticking his fingers into electric outlets, experiencing a shock that would
shake his tiny frame in uncontrollable fits of pure blue intensity until mother
or father would knock him from the source of his excitement.
Indeed,
MichaelÕs coming in to the world, as I have suggested, was attended with the
same willful attitude, that same stubborn resistance to physical law which
would be the mark of much of his later strife. His insistence on a birth date near to the Winter Solstice,
instead of being clustered with his Scorpio family (mother Mary Ellen, sister
Laura, and brother William were all Scorpios) in October and November, showed
very clearly the power of his will as adamantine proof of his powers of
orchestration. He was fond of
claiming this at least, feeling that his own will had turned him in to an
11-month baby.
As I have written, Michael was delicate, thin, shy as a boy,
protected by his big brother, even more so by his older sister. He was dreamy, spending hours at a time
by himself in a basement room. His
mother would check on him, hour after hour, worrying aout him, finding that he
had not moved, that he was totally absorbed in some project which had,
presumably, no real value in itself, being the means, instead, by which young
Michael slipped into an area without bounds.
Michael,
even when very young, was fiercely independent. Early in life he learned to escape tyrannical situations by
withdrawing into the atmosphere of dreams wherein he ruled the world simply
through silent concentration.
William loved his brother ferociously, wished to protect him, to possess
him, to possess him through ruling him.
Nothing infuriated William so much, and rendered him so powerless, as
MichaelÕs ability to abstract himself from such oppression. Michael could, at a momentÕs notice (in
words he would later use) Ômanifest inwardlyÕ, thereby rendering the physical
reality obsolete, or, at the very least, non-obstructive, unobtrusive, and
rendering MichaelÕs older brother largely reduced as a form of tyranny.
Michael
was never very competitive.
Winning was not obligatory to him.
Winning a game or a race was quite irrelevant. Winning passed away.
The excitement of the competition was superior to the winning –
but even this excitement of competition passed. Again, win or lose, he was left alone, as he desired it,
free from the flurry of movement, and the pressing in of the other voices.
He was truly a Winter Child, reflective, silent, dark
(physically – and, later, heÕd be told, spiritually as well). No one ever knew him. It could be said, accurately I believe,
that none of us are every truly known.
With Michael, however, no one, at least until Leslie Harmon, ever really
penetrated his armor. His armor,
put simply, was his distance from the Earth. At a glance, a word, he could travel aeons, abstract himself
in to a form which was (I call it) Ônon-humanÓ: an ÔangelicÕ location it seemed
to me, becoming entirely self-sufficient, melancholy, cold perhaps, yet not
unkind, and not untouched.
With
Leslie, this changed. He ÔfellÕ
from his great distance, falling in love, like Lucifer from his minioned
heights. Like Icarus from his
smoky ascendancy. His crash was
devastating, to all who knew him.
His grief was not without its grace; his madness from grief was not
lacking in magnitude; indeed, the entire episode was pregnant with magnitude;
he was like some fallen god, tearing the curtained Earth to shreds with his
anguished, lonely fury, his silent hopeless dance of pain.
I
wanted to reach out to him, to help him bear his fractured image, the vacuum of
a broken idol: yet, even in his suffering, he was distant. His brother reached him; only his
brother could reach him; I tried, yet failed, never being able to fathom such
loss, such intensity of disrepair.
I never really found him again.
In some ways, I believe he died when his love died, when his love was
torn from its fragile soil, when he fled from the site of his pain. He never stopped fleeing. He sought to climb the skin of the
heavens. He tried to find a hole
in the sky. And, having apparently
found the hole in the sky, he never really returnedÉ
To comprehend the transformation of this young angel, his
journey thorugh hell and back again, from All-American Idealist to Foresaker of
the World, it is necessary to comprehend the influence of Catholicism on his
world-view. There is no Catholic
so adamantine, so immovabl, in his pursuit of truth ( a seeming absurdity), as
the Ex-Catholic. The Ex-Catholics
are the true Catholics, a dispersed army of Jesuits, living in the world but
not at home in the world, without community of sorrow or faith in custom,
seekers of some Truth (some anti-Truth), some form a absolute experience. They are the dangerous ones, crusaders
for the non-existent, tyrants of self-damnation – and, therefore,
damnation of the world as an obsolete relfection of a purer image: seekers
after Death, who holds the key to a Second ChildhoodÉ
And
this last phrase leads me again to a fresh understanding of why this structure
of narrative I am seeking to develop cannot be so rigid, so linear as some
would like. My tendency to slip
from anecdotes about or descriptions of the Clause BrothersÕ (first)
ÔchildhoodÕ into similar particles of evidence from their most recent
experiences, their ÔsecondÕ childhood, if you will, is reflective of the nature
of their travels through the circuit of life.
This
section, CHILDHOOD,
includes images and adventure from the Clause BrotherÕs entire life (MichaelÕs
life; William, apparently, still lives, somewhere, having disappeared without a
word after the death of his brother) simply because they never left their
childhood. CHILDHOOD might be the title of the book
itself, had not the image, the remembrance, of Michael, actually, of the three
of us, as choirboys, been too devastating (in its innocence) for me to eschew.
The
three of us sang together, with many other St. JosephÕs School neophytes, led by
Sister Mary Olive, a rotund, cherubic figure, rotund also in good humor and
humanity, who led us in our notes as a water-buffalo leads her young through
chest-deep streams toward higher ground.
We stood above the congregation, in the loft, peering down at the hatted
and unhatted (men and women sat on different sides of the church in those early
days, the women with hats, the men bare-headed), lifting our spirits in chords
of worship, raising our lilting spirits into the rafter for wondrous worship.
Singing
made us clean, it seemed. Many of
us could not sing; some refused to sing, merely mouthing lyrics in a silent
calisthenic, fearful of being discovered in tuneless mediocrity or considering
singing unworthy, unsophisticated and unnecessary. Michael loved to sing, however. He would lose himself in song, merging himself with the
other tremors scaling up toward heaven, reaching beyond with the velvet of his
voice, building in some violet network a picture of reality experienced only by
the sense of joy that was hidden somewhere in his song.
Catholic School children have a different quality about
them, compared with Public School children. We all became painfully aware of this, after some eight
years of ÔprivateÕ schooling, when we attended the only high school in Rawlins,
a ÔpublicÕ school, Rawlins High School.
Public School children were wilder, more experienced (more sinful, more
cynical, more jaded) – and even more violent. Rougher; less disciplined. Every year a new group of lambs were thrown in to the ring
with the more raffish elements of the town, more experienced socially,
sexually; more educated scientifically; more aggressive athletically -- less
sequestered, generally – with whom these new usually well-mannered,
well-groomed, reserved, semi-paragons of virtue were forced to compete and
dwell and communicate and be molded.
Angels cast into the world of the beasts. Choirboys turned from their cloister and song, turned out
like swallows, into a sky ruled by hawks.
It
was as exciting as it was dangerous.
The world was enlarged, complicated, enriched, even as it was soiled (a
better word is annihilated) by its magnification. This transition was a challenge to the Clause Brothers (as
it was to all of us). William made
the transition quite easily, although he, too, had his moments of emotions and
moral crucifixion.
I
might say that the transition was even more difficult for Michael, although IÕm
not sure that was true. William
had already preceded him, laying the groundwork for his advent. His sister Laura had preceded him even
earlier; indeed, she broke the ice in nearly all the initiatory rituals of the
odyssey into man- and woman-hood required of unsuspecting babies forced into
the role of awkward androids. She
suffered for her ÔleadershipÕ, having to become the second mother of the two
brothers at such an early age, a responsibility which forced upon her such a
seriousness of purpose (early transformation into adulthood), that her own
childhood appeared to be stunted, distorted, causing her to leap from child to
adult in such a short length of time that her sense of humor never really
survived the demand.
LauraÕs
world became narrowed by responsibility so early in her life that it never
really expanded beyond the confines of her town, the smallest perimeter of
interest an adult might be capable of experiencing. The practical concerns – of protecting and guiding and
disciplining her brothers – suffocated the ÔchildÕ in Laura Clause to the
point that she quickly became excluded form the world of phantoms and planets
and political polarizations which only the lyricism of drams can mold and which
was and ever remained the stuff which filled the shape of the world of her two
brothers.
William
left childhood for a time. I have
mentioned his journey to Australia to teach high school English after he
completed college. I have not
mentioned his love in high school (Michelle was her name, not insignificantly),
who initiated him in to the ritual of flesh, she being, at the age of fourteen,
practiced in the art of love, as eager to teach as she was dedicated a student;
I have also not mentioned his other love, both of flesh and of spirit, the two
usually not having the same object, name or complicated resolution. I have not mentioned that William contracted
syphilis from a pretty blonde in college whose greatest ambition in life was to
be able to sleep with Rod Stewart, the English rock star. William was more worldly, and more
physical that Michael, at least up to a point.
MichaelÕs
transition to the chaotic world of High School was also rendered less trying by
his aforementioned skill of abstracting himself mentally or spiritually from
difficulty. Essentially, MichaelÕs
transition to the larger world was excruciating, as any shattering of identity
is bound to be, of being swallowed by a mass of motion, by a density of a world
pre-existent and resolutely unconcerned with his presence. Yet it was not the lack of recognition
that troubled him; rather, it was the lack of anonymity. It was the danger of being pulled form
out of a coiling mass, differentiated by name, by insistance on identity, which
really troubled the displaced choirboy.
He
was skilled in the art of disappearance.
The art of re-entry, of being forced to stand amid Earthlings was more
difficult, because transparent. He
was being asked to wear a mask.
And he would wear one, longing almost immediately to take it off. If he could have stayed for ever in his
room certainly he would have chosen that.
Yet Life called him out.
Life demanded he perform.
It is no wonder that, later, as a writer (another mask, he
knew), Marcel Proust came to charm him, not only because of his magical
literary universe, his labyrinthine prose, and serene, metrical, symphonic
human metaphysic – but also with his reclusive lifestyle, his ultimate
self-exile, his retreat into the cork-lined bedroom of his childhood, into the
heart of the metre of childhood itself, which Michael believed was the goal of
our surging and brutal conquest of landscapes: Ages, monuments of centuries,
the length of adulthood spent twisting, stealing, killing, lying, cheating, in
order to return to the land of our Youth.
And in this Youth to find annihilation, sweet in its essence, if, indeed,
bitter in its husk.
Michael
once said to me, commenting on the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey: ÔThe only really compelling scenes
in the movie were the first and the last – this, certainly, intended by
its maker. Birth and Death, with a
strange, laborious rather flat intermezzo filled with striving. That middle string of necessity being
the long conquest of Mundane Time – that ragged Summer of
discontent. A task, a cross: all
precedent to disengagementÉÕ
It
is the fate of the tragic to be obsessed with Death. Great art seems to spring from this obsession. The greatest of men, perhaps, are those
who live the closest to Death, thereby recognizing Her significance in every
step they take – and, through this, also, the true significance of LifeÉ
The
question of the gender of Death: yes, Michael believed that Death was a woman,
at least his own Death was a woman.
Perhaps Death appeared as a Man to the woman. I donÕt know.
We never discussed that.
He
believed that Death (as a process) was a form of love, a form of orgasmic
extinction, in which (for himself), the Ôunattainable womanÕ, the Muse,
Immortality herself (perhaps Shekinah in Jewish myth), absorbed the isolated
soul drawing him out from his isolated existence. Real Love was finally attained: the Absolute: the Ideal.
Michael
became obsessed with Death, after his love for Leslie Harmon
disintegrated. He began to study
symbols, the occult, old scriptural writings. He had no need of religion, as an institution; yet the
kernel of vision, hidden in symbolic writing, led him deeper and deeper into
the ancient nature of the world.
He came back toward his Catholicism, not as a form of state so much,
rather as a history of solar strife.
Early Christianity, Gnostic in its nature: this interested him much
more. Christ became a symbol of
his own life, his own struggles: a symbol of the Soul in all life, animate and
inanimate, organic and, yes, even, inorganic matter. The Sun-Hero was the soul who existed in every culture, who
turned, in Time, through all the seasons, all the houses of the Solar Clock,
the mansions of Light and the phantom-mansions of the Shades.
MichaelÕs
own life became mythological. The
mundane became mythological – which, he said, was what happened in 2001:
A Space Odyssey. Out of mundane time was born the Life-Death
transition, which was mythological by nature.
He
came to see the history of the Earth, the history of Life, Universal HistoryÉhe
saw this story of Eternity reflected in himself. He was not only who he was in his Time-Body as Michael
Clause he was also all that had come before and all that would come afterÉ.
I donÕt really understand exactly what he saw. I have his letters, which he sent to me
from Eugene, which certainly represent bits of his holographic form and
logic. I have also portions of his
great work Conversations On A Dying Age, to which he devoted himself up to the end. The original manuscript was not found
after his death; people who knew him speculated that William may have left with
the manuscript; some even conjectured that William retired to the woods to live
some hermetic life, perhaps to study his brotherÕs writing. Another remembered Michael saying he
would leave, in his work, a map by which William would be able to see the future,
to lead his American society our of its youthful turmoil. All remains speculation, however. William left his belongings after
MichaelÕs death, simply disappearing, contacting no one, just vanishing.
I
will present these ideas of Michael later in this story. At present I am more concerned with understanding
the early life of the man, and his brother.